The Case for a 21st Century New Deal:
A
Presidential & Congressional Accountability
Act
Date: October 20, 2013
The past week saw the government shutdown and debt-ceiling limit fight
come to an end. The cost of this particular episode of government irresponsibility
is estimated at $24 billion with nearly a million jobs lost during
the 16 days. Only a Congress helmed by a bunch of swivel-eyed loons
would have gone down that road putting the nation at risk.
This amounts to financial terrorism against the country.
The NYTimes ran an article a couple of weeks ago that this government
shutdown was planned for months beginning after the presidential election
last year and was the work of the Koch Brothers, former Reagan Attorney
General Edwin Meese, Jim DeMint, and about three dozen conservative
groups, and carried out by their foot soldiers Ted Cruz, Eric Cantor, and
crew. Michele Bachmann, when interviewed on TV, was enthusiastic about
shutting down the government.
Would those politicians or wealthy conservatives do this if they could be
held financially responsible for their actions? Imagine, Ted Cruz, Michele
Bachmann, the Koch brothers, and the other Tea Party Republicans being
held financially responsible for $24 billion and the cost of almost 1 million
jobs? Chances are they might have second thoughts if the public could
come after their assets or have them face prison time, or even strip them oftheir citizenship.
Like Wall Street, who will steal anything not bolted down, politicians will do
anything they think they can get away with in the name of party ideology
and to curry favor for the Koch Brothers’ financial largess. Why? Because
they know they can get away with it with few if any repercussions and it
will almost be forgotten by next election.
Remember in 1999 on behalf of Wall Street (Sandy Weill of Citigroup in particular),
Bill Clinton repealed Glass-Steagall, a law which prevented another
financial crisis for 66 years since the Great Depression. Nine years after the
repeal, the U.S. suffered a financial calamity on par with The Great Depression
and resulted in trillions of dollars of damages.
And since signing the repeal and leaving office, Clinton has made $106 million
in speaking engagements mostly resulting from Wall Street companies,
in addition to collecting $1.5 million annually in a taxpayer-funded federal
retirement pension. And don’t forget he was responsible for the 1996
Telecomm Act deregulating and consolidating the phone companies and
the Welfare Reform Act of 1996.
It’s time to stop letting these dopey fuckwits make a mess, stick taxpayers
with the bill, and then walk away scot-free, so they can return a few
months later and do it all over again, and then eventually retire to private
sector riches as a result of all the sweetheart deals they passed for big
businesses and the rich.
It’s unacceptable that these elected politicians accept bribes in the form of
campaign contributions and then pass laws that end up being sweetheart
deals for the big business and rich people, leaving the rest of the country
to pick up the tab.
Don’t forget, these are all the same people who have been preaching “accountability” to everyone else when they want to cut the social safety net,
reduce benefits, cut Social Security & Medicare, and break the Social Contract
people have had with their government since the New Deal; all for tax
breaks, subsidies, and a transfer of wealth to the elites. As JFK said, “You
can’t negotiate with people who say what’s mine is mine, and what’s yours
is negotiable.” Thirty plus years of evidence prove this.
The NDP Proposal
To that end, it’s time to pass a Presidential and Congressional Accountability
Act law retroactive to the Clinton administration that makes elected
representatives of the people personally and financially responsible for any
mischief they create. This law will extend to lobbyists and private citizens
that fund these movements. Penalties for actions will include severe financial
penalties, harsh prison time, and stripping of citizenship.
Such a law can even be considered as an amendment to the Constitution, which could be a solution to getting money out of politics.